Carl Sorensen wrote: > Amen to that. If only they had made some kind of an accomodation clause > that would have allowed projects with mixed v2 and v3 licenses to go > forward, as long as the v3 license terms were followed on the combined > package (e.g. no tivoization, and following the patent stuff). But they > don't.
There was no way they could have done that, unfortunately. :-( It's not a matter of GPLv3 accommodating GPLv2 but the other way round -- GPLv2 has a 'no additional clauses' requirement and GPLv3 applies ... additional clauses. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
