On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:00:53PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 10:50 AM
>
>> - AU is looking really lean once we kill AU 1 and 2, so this would
>>  give that manual more of a reason to exist.
>
> Not a *good* reason, though

:)

>> Besides, "suggestions for writing files" totally _sounds_ like
>> "usage" information to me.  :)
>
> Not sure about "totally".  Maybe 5.1.1, 5.1.2 and 5.1.3 are
> "usage", but 5.1.4 and 5.1.5 look much more like teaching
> material to me.  I'd find these last two useful in LM 3.

Ah, I'd forgotten about those.  Yes, 5.1.4 and 5.1.5 would be
better off in LM 3.  Or maybe LM 4, since they both discuss
tweaks.

To avoid making the same mistake, 5.2.3 is covered in the website.
5.2.1 could go easily with the other convert-ly docs.  This leaves
5.2.2, which IMO lies somewhere between "reference" material and
"sequential reading" material.  As such, I think it's better
suited in the AU than LM.

Cheers,
- Graham


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to