On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:18:45AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 3:05 AM > >> Could you redistribute the material in LM 5.2 Scores and parts >> elsewhere in the LM? Maybe beef up LM 2.4.1, maybe insert a new > > Done. I made a new subsection at the end of LM 3.4. It can't > go earlier as it assumes knowledge of \new etc.
Thanks! > It also uses \include, which isn't introduced anywhere, but Woah, seriously? LM 3.1 is perfect for that. Anyway, I'll leave this for you. >> I leave it up to your judgement; I just want to start abolishing >> LM 5 and making the new Usage document, so I'd like that >> subsection gone so it's easier to keep track of what I need to >> deal with. :) > > Perhaps we should move 5.1 Suggestions for writing ... to > LM 3 too. LM 3 then becomes rather more general, but that's > no bad thing. Shall I do that now? No; I think the rest of LM 5 is going into the AU. Makefiles: AU without a doubt. Suggestions and Errors: we could make a case in both ways. For me, it comes down to two things: - people might want to look at Errors during their daily use, whereas theoretically the LM is for an initial-read only. (assuming people remember the overall info) - AU is looking really lean once we kill AU 1 and 2, so this would give that manual more of a reason to exist. Besides, "suggestions for writing files" totally _sounds_ like "usage" information to me. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
