Graham Percival wrote:
> > No, I'm wondering because I updated the syntax with a new
> > command in a recent patch of mine:
>
> Ah, I see. No, of course it won't. The index is built purely
> from @funindex. Ralph Palmer is gradually indexing material,
> but of course he wouldn't notice this addition to Dynamics (he's
> finished that).
>
> I guess we should have rejected that patch of yours. :P
Well, now we know. I'm glad that I caught the issue now and not
later.
> Once John says it's safe to do doc work again, I'll add a
> checklist for doc modification. (if there's a new command,
> did you add a @funindex)
Definitely put that on your TODO list or put a stub there or
something.
I wonder if there's a good way to find un-indexed commands that
are floating in the source ether...
- Mark
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
