Graham Percival wrote: > It's done with texinfo's index generation. All > @funindex foo > entries are collected and genereated into the index. Internally, > our @funindex macro is expanded to @findex and @kindex. > > If you're wondering because you want to improve the readibility of > the index, that would require patches to texinfo/makeinfo and > texi2html. :( We've had a few requests for this, but it's > outside our control.
No, I'm wondering because I updated the syntax with a new command in a recent patch of mine: Add dynamic script fffff; update docs. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=a905c95c63cffb9c551e599e0fa5bf1840bb737c Will the new \fffff command automagically appear in NR F? If not, I wonder how many other commands are defined but not @funindex'ed? - Mark _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
