2009/6/24 Carl D. Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>:

> But if we're eliminating Dynamic_engraver, all the functionality it has will
> be going away anyway.  So I don't think there's any loss in changing the
> name.

Fair enough; I guess I've just got used to the name New_dynamic_engraver. :)

Regards,
Neil


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to