On 6/24/09 2:33 PM, "Neil Puttock" <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Carl D. Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>:
>
>> Shouldn't we do this by eliminating Dynamic_engraver and renaming
>> New_dynamic_engraver to Dynamic_engraver?
>
> I'm not sure, since New_dynamic_engraver doesn't have all the
> functionality of Dynamic_engraver (though it would be easy enough to
> have a convert rule which adds Dynamic_align_engraver if necessary.)
But if we're eliminating Dynamic_engraver, all the functionality it has will
be going away anyway. So I don't think there's any loss in changing the
name.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
