Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 00:33 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> Unfortunately, a lot of packages are not meant to be cross-compiled, > so a lot of things that GUB does are hackish. I'd not worry too much > about the messages; as long as things work, there are things much more > important than polishing gub Note that GUB is our third cross build system. Cross building a whole dependency chain of packages can be quite a challenge. Combine that with laziness and ignorance and you have the reason why our previous incarnations of cross build systems mostly worked with an old style [shellish/perlish] concept: ignore any errors unless explicitly checked and let's hope for the best--just as long as the **** thing builds! GUB is, amongst other things, an attempt at a dependable build system, most any error will break the build---I'm sure you've noticed ;-) Having said that, looking at eliminating warnings is always a good thing if it's not conflicting with other priorities.. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter AvatarĀ®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel