Not alone ! I asked quite the same question just one month ago. You can read the answers in the archives there : http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-05/msg00521.html
Still hoping... Xavier 2009/6/24 Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> > Hi devs! > > The two MetronomeMark behaviours I would like to fix (or $pon$or for > fixing) are: > > 1. The break-alignment situation (q.v., <http://code.google.com/p/ > lilypond/issues/detail?id=684&can=1&q=metronomemark>). > > Any recent movement/news on this issue? > Can this be fixed in Scheme or only C++? > > > 2. The fact that MetronomeMarks collide painfully when extracted parts have > multi-measure rests, e.g. > > \version "2.12.2" > \layout { \context { \Score skipBars = ##t } } > mmProblem = \relative > { > \tempo \markup { "My first tempo marking" } R1*5 > \tempo \markup { "My second tempo marking" } R1*3 > \tempo \markup { "My third tempo marking" } R1*3 > } > \score { \mmProblem } > > Can anyone see a way to indicate that "this MetronomeMark has a minimum > measure length of X", so the collisions seen in my example would not happen? > > > Thanks, > Kieren.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
