Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Please don't extend the syntax lightly. Try to make something based > > on music functions or \tweak first; if it finds wide spread > > adoption, you can always add cute syntax later. > > Given the infrequency of this request, I second this.
Just found this... (: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-04/msg00081.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
