On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:56:07PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > What do you guys think of including a sample Makefile somewhere in the > documentation?
I've been wanting this since before GDP. > I've looked at Nicolas Sceaux's > makefile for his operas, and at the GNUMakefile in the LP documentation, > but they're so complex that I couldn't use them as models for my own. I would expect that most of that complexity can be removed due to the new relative \include paths. > My initial thought is to put the sample makefile in either 1) > application usage, where it gives the lilypond-book commands, or 2) LM > "handling large projects." AU is slated for demolishment, but there's nothing wrong with dumping it there as a quick fix; then we'll have the material available when we move to the next thing. LM 5 was never finished, so there's also nothing wrong with dumping it there as a quick fix. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
