On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:30:56PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2009/4/19 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > > > Historically, we sent the snippet to the LSR editor to deal with. > > Since we *still* don't have a dedicated LSR editor who has nothing > > better to do than play with web-2.0 things... i.e. the people who > > /are/ LSR editors are sufficiently skilled that they can be even > > more useful to lilypond by fixing bugs or whatnot... this becomes > > problematic. > > I'm still available to do that, though nobody's contacted me since > GDP. (and though Neil is clearly more reliable than me to run and push > makelsr) > > The 24-to-48h delay between doc changes and lsr updates is certainly > inconvenient, but I think we can ask the doc editors to handle the > commenting/uncommenting of their @lsr reference on their own.
No; we ask the LSR editors to do this, because they know when the snippets have been added! Doc writers will add a @c LSR above the relevant line, so that the LSR editor can find it quickly. But once a doc writer has sent the email to the LSR editor, he can forget about the entire thing. This way, it doesn't inconvenience the doc writers, and only adds two minutes a week to the LSR editor's job. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
