On 1/24/09 5:15 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" <reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2009 23:38:53 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
>> Both markup fret diagrams and harp pedal markups share the
>> instrument-specific-markup interface. The instrument-specific-markup
>> interface contains fret-diagram-details, harp-pedal-details, size, and
>> thickness.
>>
>> Do we need to combine the two interfaces into one
>> instrument-specific-markup-interface? This seems strained to me. I would
>> prefer to have a
> [...]
>> so that the two aren't combined. I think that will be more clear.
>>
>> Is there any reason not to do that?
>
> Funny thing is, you suggested to create one instrument-specific-markup-
> interface:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-08/msg00325.html
>
Yes, but I always reserve the right to change my mind. I guess that means
I'm in touch with my feminine side. ;)
Having seen how it shakes out in the documentation, it seems wrong to have
an instrument-specific-markup-interface. I thought it would be nice to have
one additional interface to add to TextScript objects. Now I think it
would be better to have separate interfaces for each of the
instrument-specific markups. It makes it more clear which properties apply
to which markups.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
