On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Chris Snyder <csny...@adoromusicpub.com>wrote:
> On December 20, 2008, Chris Snyder wrote:
> > I did realize that the ly_symbol2scm call was not needed. I've
> > attached a new patch that does not include it.
>
> Is there any chance of my patch being accepted into master? What can I
> do to make the process easier? Thanks.
In general, the best approach is to nag us from time to time. If we don't
like the patch, we'll say so; if you get no response, your email probably
just got stuck under a pile of other stuff.
That said, I'm not sure why this patch is necessary. I see that the prebaked
commands like \arpeggioBracket don't work on span arpeggios, but the
following does "work" without your patch:
\new PianoStaff \relative c'' <<
\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\new Staff {
\override Score.Arpeggio #'stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-slur
<c e g c>4\arpeggio
<g c e g>4\arpeggio
<e g c e>4\arpeggio
<c e g c>4\arpeggio
}
\new Staff {
\clef bass
\repeat unfold 4 {
<c,, e g c>4\arpeggio
}
}
>>
I put "work" in quotation marks because the result looks quite horrible. I
think this is what the documentation meant when it said that cross-staff
arpeggios don't work with the slur-like look (unlike the other sorts of
brackets, the slur brackets take up more space when they go cross-staff and
this space isn't accounted for).
Joe
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
