Le 16.12.2008 17:20, Carl D. Sorensen disait :
On 12/16/08 8:58 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <janneke-l...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 15:58 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
You might call for using Unicode:
r16 g♯( a g♯ f♯♯ g♯ c♯ e d♯ c♯ d♯ c♯ b♯ c♯ e
g♯)
You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
Now that's a fun idea. It even works!
Thank you. I think it increases readability, too.
If you want readabilty, why not have
♯g( a ♯g ♯♯f
etc? For typeability, ymmv though.
I think that, even though accidentals come before the note in musical
output, in the text stream g# is much more readable than #g.
I would have beaten the the world record of the 100m escaping out of the
music school if I would have had to say "double bémol sol". Nevertheless
it is a matter of vocal cords, I still sing "sol" and not "fa"...
Jean-Charles
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
