> > . Scripts which are run by the build process. These *must*
> > substitute the Python binary path.
> >
> > . Scripts which are run by the lilypond maintainers so that the
> > data in the git repository is in good shape. All such files
> > should be moved to a separate directory.
> >
> > The only question is whether those two subsets intersect.
>
> To be pedantic, there are three types of scripts; the above two,
> plus scripts that are run by the end user.
Yes, but I was only talking about the stuff in `buildscripts'.
> Might it be worth rearranging the dirs to be:
>
> scripts/
> scripts/build/
> scripts/user/
> scripts/mainter/
>
> ?
I don't care.
> I'm not sure what we would really gain from this, though. But then
> again, I'm not sure what we really gain from separating
> buildscripts/ from mainterscripts/.
Only stuff in buildscripts should need a substitution of @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
