On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 07:58:52AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > There are two types of scripts: > > . Scripts which are run by the build process. These *must* > substitute the Python binary path. > > . Scripts which are run by the lilypond maintainers so that the data > in the git repository is in good shape. All such files should be > moved to a separate directory. > > The only question is whether those two subsets intersect.
To be pedantic, there are three types of scripts; the above two, plus scripts that are run by the end user. Might it be worth rearranging the dirs to be: scripts/ scripts/build/ scripts/user/ scripts/mainter/ ? I'm not sure what we would really gain from this, though. But then again, I'm not sure what we really gain from separating buildscripts/ from mainterscripts/. > On the other hand, there are already targets `check-translation' and > `update-translation' in Documentation/GNUmakefile; why not use them? Some people like Python a /lot/ more than makefiles? ;) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel