Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before: What do you think
> of using `c[]' as a shorthand for `\autoBeamOff c \autoBeamOn'?
>
> Currently, `c[]' produces
>
> _____
> |
> |
> O
>
> (a note with a beamlet to the left and right), which is neither
> documented nor makes much sense IMHO.
>
> My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite
> convenient:
>
> c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8
>
This may have nothing to do with your proposal/question but as a reader
I would find your example much harder to read/sightread than
c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16] } c8
or
c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16 } c8]
Paul Scott
> (see attached image).
>
>
> Werner
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
