> > I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before: What do you
> > think of using `c[]' as a shorthand for `\autoBeamOff c
> > \autoBeamOn'?
>
> When I was first learning lilypond I remember trying this exact
> syntax to get an unbeamed note. I think it would be useful if it
> worked. It's a big win to be able to figure out how to do something
> with out having to consult the documentation.
Ah, right, this is an argument I haven't thought of. So I \revert my
opinion: having c[] do the right thing would be nice :-)
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
