> It's a bit of a halfbaked solution. If you don't want to compile lily, > why not use the pre-rolled binary. > > Also, it would be nice if some of these perverse hackers could just > add an autoconf check for said program.
Hmm, something like [1] (s/inkscape/t1asm/) ? [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-10/msg00002.html > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> FWIW I also like the idea of having less dependencies, but not at > >> the price of being unable to hack the source. Even if that is the > >> source to a font. > > > > Well, adding pre-compiled fonts to the tarball just remove a > > dependency. As soon as you remove the fonts, they are rebuilt. > > Where's the problem? Regards, /Karl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
