If you check current.txt on the GDP site, you'll see that it wasn't me. :)
Anyway, the important question was the style, and it seems you agree with it. In other words, other NR 2 rewriters can look at this as a good example of how to write their own. Cheers, - Graham On Sun, 11 May 2008 09:27:41 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the brief descriptions and refs as a bulleted list. "Perfect" > might be going too far, but it looks pretty good :) > > The question to ask now is, is this list of refs complete - does it > contain pointers to everything (fairly) specific to keyboards which a > keyboard typesetter might need? But getting the balance right is > tricky, since otherwise we'd be adding references to everything from > everywhere. I think what you've done is pretty close to what we > need. Even so, I'd like to see a ref to PianoStaff, and maybe to > writing multiple voices, which are essential for and fairly specific > to keyboard music. Maybe a ref to 1.6.1.2 Grouping staves would > cover both these. > > Trevor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "lily-devel" <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 4:32 AM > Subject: NR 2: referencences for XXX > > > > Here's a sample "References for XXX", from NR 2.2.1.1: > > > > http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/References-for-keyboards.html > > > > - does this look perfect? (the style, not the actual contents... > > although if you see any problem with the content, we wouldn't > > mind hearing abou that) > > > > - should anything change? > > > > Cheers, > > - Graham > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-devel mailing list > > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
