I like the brief descriptions and refs as a bulleted list. "Perfect" might
be going too far, but it looks pretty good :)
The question to ask now is, is this list of refs complete - does it contain
pointers to everything (fairly) specific to keyboards which a keyboard
typesetter might need? But getting the balance right is tricky, since
otherwise we'd be adding references to everything from everywhere. I think
what you've done is pretty close to what we need. Even so, I'd like to see a
ref to PianoStaff, and maybe to writing multiple voices, which are essential
for and fairly specific to keyboard music. Maybe a ref to 1.6.1.2 Grouping
staves would cover both these.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lily-devel" <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 4:32 AM
Subject: NR 2: referencences for XXX
Here's a sample "References for XXX", from NR 2.2.1.1:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/References-for-keyboards.html
- does this look perfect? (the style, not the actual contents...
although if you see any problem with the content, we wouldn't
mind hearing abou that)
- should anything change?
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
