Le mercredi 26 décembre 2007 à 07:06 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit : > On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:00:59 +0100 > John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd like to deeply change doc snippets presentation: as tags were > > recently added to LSR, we should put all snippets in the same > > directory, resulting in a single PDF file and a single HTML page for > > all snippets.
> I'm honestly not certain that this tradeoff is worth it -- even > disregarding the amount of work involved. What problem(s) is this > supposed to solve? There are some small problems with having subdirectories in input/lsr, as Han-Wen already pointed out, for example duplicate files (e.g. volta-multi-staff.ly), longer build time caused by splitted Texinfo and PDF builds. These details are only technical, but there are more important ones. For example, t'd be a good thing to build a single Texinfo document (with .itelys) for all snippets, so we could easily get a single PDF and a single with all snippets sorted by categories (this is a user request IIRC), and a set of HTML pages with one category (or tag) per page, with easy navigation (we have this, but with no easy navigation); to achieve this, we should not use subdirectories. I'm ready to work on makefiles, makelsr.py and lys-to-tely.py to achieve this. I think it's much more reasonable that my previous proposal, what do you think? Best, John _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
