Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> Well, the comment in mf/feta-schrift.mf: >> >> % I actually have no clue how they should look, so we use a >> % slightly curvy and tapered shape. >> >> seemed to imply that the shape was designed by guessing, not by >> using a hand-engraved example. Also, the corresponding threads in >> the mailing list archives gave the impression that all real-world >> examples encountered by users had the shape of straigth parallel >> slashes. That's why I suggested to replace the glyph. >> > > ... Basically, you are right, however, we have already to think about > backwards compatibility... > Perhaps a poll would be useful. I'm willing to bet that there is no one using the curved glyph except like me as a poor substitute for the real thing.
Of course, if I am wrong I have no objection to the existance of the curved glyph. I will just be overjoyed if the correct glyph appears in 2.12. Thanks, Paul Scott _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
