Graham Percival wrote:
Agree! Often such division into different categories don't help at
all, they just give you more places to search from.
Other than one example (scheme programming), I have no objection to
this -- but please don't say "text, lyrics, articulation etc". I'd
like to discuss exact proposals.
Why is scheme programming so special? If I, as an ordinary user, want to
solve
a certain typesetting problem, I mostly don't have any idea if the
solution requires
Scheme programming or not and at least as long as the solution can be
copy/pasted
into my own file as it is, I wouldn't care.
What you probably have in mind is good examples to learn Scheme
programming,
but unless these examples are very contrived they will also solve some
practical
typesetting problem.
/Mats
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
