Bertalan Fodor wrote:
I feel that these categories are not leading the mind. Users usually
wants to make a graphical representation of some music, and not doing
scheme, or trick, or whatever.
For example, many tweaks are ''simple'' ''scheme-trick''s, that
(naturally) involves some ''scheme-programming''... I'd better see
categories like: text, lyrics, articulation etc.
Agree! Often such division into different categories don't help at all,
they just
give you more places to search from. No matter how we choose the
categories,
there will always be a number of examples that don't fit anywhere or
that fit
perfectly well into several categories. The main thing, in my opinion,
is that
it's easy to search in all the examples (preferably including Regression
Tests and
maybe even all examples from the manual) and that it's easy to browse
through
them all. It's often you search for some feature where you really don't
know what
word to search for but where it's easy to recognize it in the typeset
examples,
especially considering that many users don't have English as their
mother tongue.
/Mats
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
