On Thursday 07 September 2006 02:25, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 15:08 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Joe Neeman wrote:
> > By "the absence of notes", do you mean "{r | R | s} in all parts", or do
> > you mean "{s} in all parts" ? That "does not scan for rests" is a bit
> > confusing. If you mean the first option, I suggest
> >
> > +sections without notes (either @code{r} or @code{R} rests or
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] skips.
>
> I mean "{r | R | s} in all contexts that the engraver is looking at".
You mean {r | R | s | \skip}, right? (\skip doesn't generate anything, so it
is a strong form of "absence of notes")
--
Erik
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
