Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 20.42, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I'd start with 4. because they're independent from the rest, and we can
readily test the rest of those.
I'm now reworking repeats. While I'm at it, I attempt to generally clean up
the repeat code.
No, better not. In the interest in stability, we want to change as
little as possible.
- Attempt to remove various repeat iterators: Let \repeat be more like a music
function, which constructs a SequentialMusic containing the repeated musics.
What does this have to do with music streams?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
