On Tuesday 04 April 2006 20.46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > I'd start with 4. because they're independent from the rest, and we can > > readily test the rest of those.
The reason for my ordering, is that 3 can be used to verify that 4 works. BTW, (1-3) are completely independent of (4), and I have just finished step (1) locally. If you insist on getting (4) done before (1), then that's perfectly OK with me; but is it OK for you to look at my patch for (1) while I do (4)? I guess (1) is the step which requires the longest discussion, so it might be good to start the discussion early. -- Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
