Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >>> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>>Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >>>> >>>>>This is almost certainly not a compiler bug, of course, it's much more >>>>>likely a problem inside gf2pbm. >>>> >>>> Aha, GCC spews some warnings about dubitable pointer >>>> manipulations. Which GCC version is this? >>> 4.0.2. >> >> I have gcc 4, but only on an x86 box. I can have a look into cleaning >> the dubious code, but I can't test the result on PPC. Is that OK with you? > > Of course that never hurts! I'm trying to debug it myself too. > > Oddly, -O2 fails, -O1 does not, and turning the -O2 optimizations one > one-at-time doesn't cause a failure. So it must be triggered by a > combination of the two. > > Do you see any problems with -O2 on x86?
I can answer this myself: no problems on x86. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
