Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >>> >>>>This is almost certainly not a compiler bug, of course, it's much more >>>>likely a problem inside gf2pbm. >>> >>> Aha, GCC spews some warnings about dubitable pointer >>> manipulations. Which GCC version is this? >> 4.0.2. > > I have gcc 4, but only on an x86 box. I can have a look into cleaning > the dubious code, but I can't test the result on PPC. Is that OK with you?
Of course that never hurts! I'm trying to debug it myself too. Oddly, -O2 fails, -O1 does not, and turning the -O2 optimizations one one-at-time doesn't cause a failure. So it must be triggered by a combination of the two. Do you see any problems with -O2 on x86? Thomas _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
