On Sunday 22 August 2004 13.01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > "The following gives no warning (it should; the first set-option is > superfluous. The problem occurs often in reality, through \include)" } > > I disagree. Not a bug, won't fix.
ok. removed those bugs from cvs. erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
