[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Creating a makefile is a very good idea. I'm actually losing overview myself, > as well. > > Hm - while you are at it: Notice the format of the two first lines of each > file. The first line is a list of flags, the second line is a CC: field; > changes in the bug status should be cc:ed to these addresses. This is > intentionally an ugly format, and Werner has started to complain :) > > If you feel that these flags are relevant to display in your html output, feel > free to change these lines to variables within the \header block. I would > propose the variable names flags and cc. (short names => fewer typos)
:) The format does not really matter as long as we don't automate analysis and prcoessing of this information. > About reportedin: Does it mean the version where it _first_ was found, or the > _last_ version where it has been confirmed? (to me, it feels like only the > latter is interesting information, the first one is just history) I think we should have the latter, and possibly the version that introduced the bug; but that could also be a comment. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
