Ooops! Sorry, I forgot the following:
diff -Naur params-init.ly~ params-init.ly
--- params-init.ly~ Sat Mar 23 02:43:29 2002
+++ params-init.ly Tue Mar 26 01:14:40 2002
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
staffspace = \staffheight / 4.0
stafflinethickness = \staffspace / 10.0
outputscale = \staffheight / 4.0
+ledgerlinethickness = 2.0 * \stafflinethickness
% blotdiameter = 0.4 \pt
blotdiameter = 0.04 \pt
> > porrectus.cc:
> > > /*
> > >
> > > TODO:
> > >
> > > ugr. why not called direction?
> > >
> > > */
> > > SCM stem_direction_scm = me->get_grob_property ("direction");
> >
> > Because it's really only the direction of the stem (or rather
> > "cauda"), not the direction of the whole grob. But this code will
> > have to be revised in a few weeks, anyway.
>
> yes -- but I could not find a direction for the whole, grob, so the
> stem- prefix looks superfluous.
>
Mmh, well, yes. The porrectus itself just has no direction.
>
> The patch looks good. I'm putting it in.
>
Thanks. Actually, I already feared that it still would be (at least
partially) rejected, since it still does not solve all problems...
Greetings,
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
