Rick Moen scripsit:
> Likewise (issue #2), because of the narrow focus of the drafters on the > PHP product, the licence disclaimer is wrongly worded when the PHP > Licence is used for any other codebase (including third-party add-ons to > PHP). I think the objection is that by copying the PHP license into a codebase that isn't PHP, one is forced to utter a falsehood by the terms of the license, one of which is "This is PHP". But I don't see any reason to think that when you are forced to copy a license verbatim, you are necessarily standing behind any and all statements in that license. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz. --Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words" _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
