On Thursday, 15 August 2013, Richard Stallman wrote:
Tahoe-LAFS is licensed to the public under the "Transitive Grace
Period Public Licence 1.0" [*]. Tahoe-LAFS is Free and Open
software. The "Transitive Grace Period Public Licence" is an
Open Source licence.
Is that true? Or is it just a hypothetical example?
Tahoe-LAFS, currently at version 1.10, is dual licensed, under GPLv2
or any later version, and the other license mentioned above.[1] The
combination of GPLv2+ and the secondary license probably achieves
consequences other than those the project intends, but at any rate
there is no doubt that the project is copylefted free software.
Eben
[1]: See https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/README.txt
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
