McCoy,
Can you send me a diff too?
Thanks,
Pam
On 12/4/2023 9:11 AM, McCoy Smith wrote:
There are some differences between the OSI approved version and the
latest (Jan 2020) version. Most cosmetic, some potentially substantive.
Andrew, I’ll send you and Bjorn a diff between the two.
[I’ve got a project where I’m doing lots of diffs for the OSI license
list corpus so I can do this stuff pretty quick now]
*From:*License-discuss <license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org>
*On Behalf Of *Andrew Katz via License-discuss
*Sent:* Monday, December 4, 2023 8:35 AM
*To:* license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
*Cc:* Andrew Katz <andrew.k...@moorcrofts.com>; Bjorn Lundell
<bjorn.lund...@his.se>
*Subject:* Re: [License-discuss] Question Mulan Permissive Software
License
Thanks Stef
Björn also noticed the issue with the timing and the (potentially
different) two versions (I failed to do so). I don’t have time to do a
diff right now, as I’m about to head to Japan for the Open Compliance
Summit, but unless some kind person has done this by the time I
return, I will do it then.
Thanks for getting onto this so quickly.
All the best
Andrew
*From: *Stefano Maffulli <stef...@opensource.org>
*Date: *Monday, 4 December 2023 at 16:28
*To: *"license-discuss@lists.opensource.org"
<license-discuss@lists.opensource.org>
*Cc: *Andrew Katz <andrew.k...@moorcrofts.com>, Bjorn Lundell
<bjorn.lund...@his.se>
*Subject: *Re: [License-discuss] Question Mulan Permissive Software
License
Thanks Andrew. The entry has been corrected, with the link to the
version 2... There is a time difference I noticed though: The v2 was
submitted on December 3, 2019 and the text of the submitted version
says "december 2019". But the text of the steward version mentions
January 2020, still calling the license v2.
I updated the page with the text of the license originally submitted.
I haven't had the chance to double-check if there are any differences
between the versions from Dec and the January one.
/stef
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 8:04 PM Andrew Katz via License-discuss
<license-discuss@lists.opensource.org> wrote:
Hi All
I’ve just been reviewing the Mulan Permissive Software License
(SPDX: mulanpsl-2.0). The OSI page relating to this (approved)
license is here:
https://opensource.org/license/mulanpsl-2-0/
However, the link to the original license steward’s version links
to an associated license, the Mulan Public License 2.0 (which at a
quick glance is a form of copyleft licence and is not approved by
the OSI). They also seem to have come up with their own SPDX-like
identifier, which is not on the SPDX database (I’ll raise this
with the SPDX team):
http://license.coscl.org.cn/MulanPubL-2.0
The correct link appears to be here:
https://license.coscl.org.cn/MulanPSL2
Many thanks
Andrew
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and
not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official
statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an
opensource.org <http://opensource.org> email address.
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
