On 12/28/20 10:31 AM, Pamela Chestek wrote:
It is a misperception to think that there is any "non-binding" part of a legal document.

Which means that we should be very wary of allowing text which takes away freedoms. E.g.:

     The XYZ license permits you to do anything you want (but you shouldn't do anything I think is unethical).

Open Source is as much a marketing plan as it is a legal regime. If people may legally do things with software, but the license discourages them by telling them what they should or shouldn't do, we have failed our community.


_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to