All,

I continue to noodle with the problem of people increasingly aware of harm happening around them[1] seeking to add use-limits to open source licenses:

 * Ignoring this shift seems undesirable.
 * Tacking on use limits seems incompatible with what OSI is about.

An approach came to mind while commenting on a recent proposal to license-review and I'd be interested in views on whether this was workable: would/should it be an acceptable condition in an OSI-approved license that an unmodified project manifesto be included in any copy of the software? This potentially improves both:

 * the legal ambiguity problem: a separate manifesto need not create
   legal obligations (wording in the license to make this clear seems
   workable); and
 * the license reuse problem, because different projects will have
   different values, beliefs, and missions.

There is a real problem with updating the manifesto, but I'd like to explore whether there's any upside at all, before heading too far down that particular rabbit hole.

I am particularly interested in the abuse potential. E.g. an activist organisation gets their software into use in a target's systems. Assume that the above successfully excludes the use of copyright law to invalidate the license on a use-limitation basis, but has OSI-approval facilitated the creation of a tool for outrage-industrial complex abuse? (Joe's Puppy Restaurant uses software created by an animal rights organisation to advance the welfare of animals in optimising its supply lines for arguably the opposite outcome.) Does it matter?

- Roland


1: "woke" in contemporary usage, although that term it not particularly neutral; it is frequently used in both approving and pejorative contexts.


_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to