FSF’s definition of what is a free software license includes badgeware licenses (because such licenses still meet the 4 software freedoms), but they also do not recommend use of badgeware licenses. See the comment on the 4-clause BSD: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OriginalBSD
From: License-discuss <license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org> On Behalf Of Henrik Ingo Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 7:52 AM To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org Subject: Re: [License-discuss] CPAL 1.0 License | Badge-ware | Clarification The fact that FSF also recognizes CPAL as a free software license is an interesting addition to this argument. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
