Hi Syed On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:41 PM Syed Arsalan Hussain Shah < arsa...@buddyexpress.net> wrote:
> [1][2] Does the CPAL 1.0 considered badgeware license? > > Yes, it is the other license that has a similar attribution clause as AAL. Although it was approved by OSI in the past, there have been some suggestions that it too should be removed from the list of approved licenses. Probably AAL and CPAL would be removed together, or neither would. (Note that so far all of this is just discussion. There is currently no formal process to remove any license.) > Name | Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0 (CPAL-1.0) > OSI | APPROVED > FSF | APPROVED > > The fact that FSF also recognizes CPAL as a free software license is an interesting addition to this argument. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html henrik -- henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi +358-40-5697354 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
