On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:13 AM Nigel T <nigel.2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:03 PM Tobie Langel <to...@unlockopen.com> wrote: > >> >> I’m not arguing this point of view. I’m reporting on a point of view >> commonly held within the community. >> > > Repeated assertion doesn't show that this is a "commonly held" view. > I've pointed to a twitter poll answered by 1200 people and a blog post of a fairly influential figure in the web space as evidence of interest in these issues. Others on this list have pointed at the result of the OSI election to show the same. I'm yet to see evidence of the opposite. > I have said nothing as to whether I share this point of view or not (I >> actually hold a much more nuanced position), and I’d greatly appreciate if >> you didn’t respond to what you believe that “[I] seem to prefer,” but >> instead to what I actually wrote. It would really help keep the >> conversation friendly and productive. >> > > It has been exceedingly rude for the ethical source folks to hijack the > open source term. I think that the conversations been very tolerant given > the current state of affairs...with a couple notable exceptions and I have > only addressed what you have written as a proponent for ethical source. > I'm sorry, but being concerned with the ethical impact of technology in general and open source software in particular doesn't make me a "proponent of ethical source," whatever that means. Again, if you choose to engage with my emails and wish to start a conversation, please address what's written, not what you believe I "seem to prefer" or write "as a proponent for ethical source." Thanks! --tobie
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
