On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:03 PM Tobie Langel <to...@unlockopen.com> wrote:
> > I’m not arguing this point of view. I’m reporting on a point of view > commonly held within the community. > Repeated assertion doesn't show that this is a "commonly held" view. > I have said nothing as to whether I share this point of view or not (I > actually hold a much more nuanced position), and I’d greatly appreciate if > you didn’t respond to what you believe that “[I] seem to prefer,” but > instead to what I actually wrote. It would really help keep the > conversation friendly and productive. > It has been exceedingly rude for the ethical source folks to hijack the open source term. I think that the conversations been very tolerant given the current state of affairs...with a couple notable exceptions and I have only addressed what you have written as a proponent for ethical source.
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
