Quoting Tobie Langel (to...@unlockopen.com): > The math here assumes voters only cast a single vote, which isn't how this > election works.
No, sorry, I made no such assumption. > Afaik the 35% number Coraline shared was based on data provided by Josh. I'm sorry, but to reiterate, Ms. Ehmke's blog post claim (emphasis added) was that she and you 'did collectively secure 35% of the _votes_ from the membership'. According to OSI, there were 1,061 _votes_ cast. This other divisor being waved about (338) is said to be the number of _voters_. If I've somehow flubbed long division, please show me where. I won't even blame /usr/bin/bc, and instead just surrender my math degree directly to you. ;-> What would actually be appreciated is, when someone has time, if that person would kindly elaborate on which voting algorithm OSI uses for its Board elections. (Not urgent; I'm mostly just curious.) -- Cheers, "It's funny that pirates were always going around searching Rick Moen for treasure, and they never realized that the real r...@linuxmafia.com treasure was the fond memories they were creating." McQ! (4x80) -- Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
