On 3/15/20 12:06 PM, Russell McOrmond wrote:
Just because software license agreements aren't an appropriate avenue
to express a specific public policy concern doesn't mean that the OSI
isn't an appropriate organization to work with for people wishing to
do that type of policy work.
OSI exists to support Open Source, as defined in the Open Source
Definition, and enforced by a list of licenses that allow software to
comply with that definition. We really have nothing to say about
software that isn't open source. Ethical software is by definition not
open source. Is it a good thing? Maybe, maybe not. But it's no concern
of the Open Source Initiative.
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
