Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss dixit:
>But as it currently stands, I don’t know if I’m exposing both the USG
>**and users of my work** if I use a standard license when some of the
>clauses don’t apply.
I’m publishing digital editions of music from composers dead for long
enough their works are in the Public Domain.
I don’t know beforehand whether I have any copyright protection in
these editions. Arrangements would be clear, but an attempted faithful
transcription is hard to sell, on the other hand there’s precedent (in
my legislation) for protection of musical engraving.
I’m dealing with it as follows: I put into the footer…
© (if applicable) 2020 mirabilos; published under … licence
… and the precise licence terms in the metadata.
This should be clear enough. Of course, it’s a nōn-copyleft licence,
but AIUI you were considering CC0 as well, so perhaps it helps.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
