What about NOSA 3.0?

Thanks,
Cem Karan 

—-
Other than quoted laws, regulations or officially published policies, the views 
expressed herein are not intended to be used as an authoritative state of law 
nor do they reflect official positions of the U.S. Army, Department of Defense 
or U.S. Government.

> On Feb 26, 2020, at 1:36 PM, Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote:
> 
> All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the 
> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained 
> within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser. 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> 
> Nigel T <nigel.2...@gmail.com>:
>> Probably because there is the concern that a few folks would seek to
>> decertify licenses like NOSA and millions of lines of software that other
>> folks depend on.
> 
> That is a fair concern.
> 
> /me reads NOSA license
> 
> I would deprecate this because of the uncertainty over the interpretation
> of clause G. I would not decertify it.
> 
> I hope this illustrates a more general distinction that is helpful.
> -- 
>        Eric S. 
> Raymond&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;Caution-http://www.catb.org/~esr/&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> Caution-http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to