Agreed! And OSI must never see its job as helping grease the wheels of
commerce. There are other open source foundations doing that all too
well, thank you. Besides, I think that as long as there are permissive
licenses, the enterprise is quite happy with the way things are.
Christine Hall
Publisher & Editor
FOSS Force: Keeping tech free
http://fossforce.com
On 7/3/19 4:44 PM, Bruce Perens via License-discuss wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:20 PM Scott Peterson <spete...@redhat.com
<mailto:spete...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Helping lawyers is one thing; the OSI does this.
License creation efficiency maximization is another; a trade
association might do this.
Yes. Having an organization that efficiently approved Open Source
licenses until there were hundreds... uh... more hundreds, would IMO
ultimately be a detriment to the community.
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
