>>From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org] >>On Behalf Of VanL >>Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2019 8:56 AM >>To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org >>Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Trigger for licensee obigations
>>For example: I am a corporation, running modified AGPL software, in a way >>that is only accessible to my employees. Per the AGPL, I must give my >>employees code and rights to the modified version, even though the analysis >>relative to every other license is that this would be a private use. Further, >>I cannot in any way prevent my employees from exercising all rights under the >>AGPL, because that would be a further restriction. Thus, the AGPL has no >>private right of use for any modified version. I’m curious how you arrive at this conclusion given that AGPL says “*Each licensee is addressed as ‘you’*. ‘Licensees’ and ‘recipients’ may be individuals *or organizations*.” [although I will concede that AGPL does not explicitly state that an organization-licensee does not have obligations under the license to its own employees. I’d consider that part of the Freedom Zero concept though, for that organization].
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
