On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 12:01 PM Pamela Chestek <pam...@chesteklegal.com> wrote:
> [snip bit about synthetic performance right in AGPL] > > I assume you mean the AGPL, but only if the software has been modified. > Under the CAL, one cannot simply run the software without the licensee > having an obligation. Is it a principle of open source software that one > should be able to simply run software free of any obligations? > If that is the principle, then the AGPL fails that principle. I do not see anywhere an articulable difference between a synthetic performance right and one that calls it out on its face. Thanks, Van
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
